Perturbative versus non-perturbative decoupling of heavy quarks
Francesco Knechtli, Mattia Bruno, Jacob Finkenrath, Bj\"orn Leder,, Rainer Sommer

TL;DR
This paper investigates how heavy quarks decouple at low energies by comparing non-perturbative lattice simulation results with perturbative predictions for certain mass ratios.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison between non-perturbative lattice results and perturbative predictions for heavy quark decoupling in a theory with two heavy quarks.
Findings
Ratios like t_0(M)/t_0(0) match perturbative predictions at large M
Decoupling behavior is consistent with effective theory expectations
Results validate the leading order factorization formula in 1/M
Abstract
We simulate a theory with heavy quarks of mass . At energies much smaller than the heavy quarks decouple and the theory can be described by an effective theory which is a pure gauge theory to leading order in . We present results for the mass dependence of ratios such as . We compute these ratios from simulations and compare them to the perturbative prediction. The latter relies on a factorisation formula for the ratios which is valid to leading order in .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
