Deep learning is a good steganalysis tool when embedding key is reused for different images, even if there is a cover source-mismatch
Lionel Pibre, Pasquet J\'er\^ome, Dino Ienco, Marc Chaumont

TL;DR
Deep learning models like CNNs and FNNs significantly outperform traditional steganalysis methods, especially when embedding keys are reused across images, and they demonstrate robustness to cover-source mismatch.
Contribution
This paper shows that well-parameterized deep neural networks surpass traditional feature-based methods in steganalysis, even under cover-source mismatch conditions.
Findings
Deep learning models reduce classification error by over 16%.
CNNs and FNNs are robust to cover-source mismatch.
Optimal CNN shapes improve steganalysis performance.
Abstract
Since the BOSS competition, in 2010, most steganalysis approaches use a learning methodology involving two steps: feature extraction, such as the Rich Models (RM), for the image representation, and use of the Ensemble Classifier (EC) for the learning step. In 2015, Qian et al. have shown that the use of a deep learning approach that jointly learns and computes the features, is very promising for the steganalysis. In this paper, we follow-up the study of Qian et al., and show that, due to intrinsic joint minimization, the results obtained from a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) or a Fully Connected Neural Network (FNN), if well parameterized, surpass the conventional use of a RM with an EC. First, numerous experiments were conducted in order to find the best " shape " of the CNN. Second, experiments were carried out in the clairvoyant scenario in order to compare the CNN and FNN to an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
