Spatially-resolved dust maps from Balmer decrements in galaxies at z~1.4
Erica June Nelson, Pieter G. van Dokkum, Ivelina G. Momcheva, Gabriel, B. Brammer, Stijn Wuyts, Marijn Franx, Natascha M. Forster Schreiber,, Katherine E. Whitaker, Rosalind E. Skelton

TL;DR
This study maps dust attenuation gradients in galaxies at z~1.4, revealing how dust and star formation vary with galaxy mass and providing a correction method for spatially resolved star formation measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a parameterization of dust attenuation gradients based on stellar mass, enabling more accurate correction of star formation rates in high-redshift galaxies.
Findings
Dust attenuation gradients increase with stellar mass.
Central star formation rates are significantly underestimated without correction.
High-mass galaxies have central SFRs about six times higher after correction.
Abstract
We derive average radial gradients in the dust attenuation towards HII regions in 609 galaxies at z~1.4, using measurements of the Balmer decrement out to r~3kpc. The Balmer decrements are derived from spatially resolved maps of Halpha and Hbeta emission from the 3D-HST survey. We find that with increasing stellar mass (M) both the normalization and strength of the gradient in dust attenuation increases. Galaxies with a mean mass of <log(M)> = 9.2Msun have little dust attenuation at all radii, whereas galaxies with <log(M)>= 10.2Msun have dust attenuation toward Halpha A(Halpha)~2mag in their central regions. We parameterize this as A(Halpha) = b + c log(r), with b = 0.9 + 1.0 log(M10), c = -1.9 - 2.2 log(M10), r in kpc, and M10 the stellar mass in units of 10^10Msun. This expression can be used to correct spatially resolved measurements of Halpha to radial distributions of star…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
