TL;DR
This paper introduces a new, comprehensive framework for analyzing residential segregation that avoids ambiguous definitions, identifies income classes, and reveals how income groups distribute in relation to city density and size.
Contribution
It proposes a novel, parameter-free method to define income classes and measure segregation, accounting for polycentric city structures and density effects.
Findings
Identified three income classes: low, middle, high.
Higher-income households are more prevalent in larger cities.
Density correlates with higher-income group presence, especially in larger cities.
Abstract
The spatial distribution of income shapes the structure and organisation of cities and its understanding has broad societal implications. Despite an abundant literature, many issues remain unclear. In particular, all definitions of segregation are implicitely tied to a single indicator, usually rely on an ambiguous definition of income classes, without any consensus on how to define neighbourhoods and to deal with the polycentric organization of large cities. In this paper, we address all these questions within a unique conceptual framework. We avoid the challenge of providing a direct definition of segregation and instead start from a definition of what segregation is not. This naturally leads to the measure of representation that is able to identify locations where categories are over- or underrepresented. From there, we provide a new measure of exposure that discriminates between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
