Latency and liquidity provision in a limit order book
Julius Bonart, Martin Gould

TL;DR
This paper empirically analyzes order flow dynamics in a Nasdaq limit order book, revealing distinct phases and strategic behaviors of liquidity providers influenced by adverse selection and waiting costs.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the phases of order flow around market orders and proposes alternative explanations for observed behaviors beyond stimulated refill.
Findings
Identification of distinct order flow phases
Evidence of strategic liquidity provider behavior
Insights into adverse selection and waiting costs influence
Abstract
We use a recent, high-quality data set from Nasdaq to perform an empirical analysis of order flow in a limit order book (LOB) before and after the arrival of a market order. For each of the stocks that we study, we identify a sequence of distinct phases across which the net flow of orders differs considerably. We note some of our results are consist with the widely reported phenomenon of stimulated refill, but that others are not. We therefore propose alternative mechanical and strategic motivations for the behaviour that we observe. Based on our findings, we argue that strategic liquidity providers consider both adverse selection and expected waiting costs when deciding how to act.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
