Private False Discovery Rate Control
Cynthia Dwork, Weijie Su, Li Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces the first differentially private algorithms for controlling the false discovery rate in multiple hypothesis testing, adapting the BHq procedure and ensuring robust FDR control with minimal power loss.
Contribution
It develops differentially private FDR control algorithms based on a new proof of BHq's robustness under weak independence assumptions.
Findings
Achieves FDR control with minimal power loss under differential privacy.
Introduces a low-distortion 'one-shot' private primitive for top-k problems.
Provides a new privacy proof technique for top-k algorithms.
Abstract
We provide the first differentially private algorithms for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple hypothesis testing, with essentially no loss in power under certain conditions. Our general approach is to adapt a well-known variant of the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (BHq), making each step differentially private. This destroys the classical proof of FDR control. To prove FDR control of our method, (a) we develop a new proof of the original (non-private) BHq algorithm and its robust variants -- a proof requiring only the assumption that the true null test statistics are independent, allowing for arbitrary correlations between the true nulls and false nulls. This assumption is fairly weak compared to those previously shown in the vast literature on this topic, and explains in part the empirical robustness of BHq. Then (b) we relate the FDR control properties of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
