nIFTy galaxy cluster simulations II: radiative models
Federico Sembolini, Pascal Jahan Elahi, Frazer R. Pearce, Chris Power,, Alexander Knebe, Scott T. Kay, Weiguang Cui, Gustavo Yepes, Alexander M., Beck, Stefano Borgani, Daniel Cunnama, Romeel Dav\'e, Sean February, Shuiyao, Huang, Neal Katz, Ian G. McCarthy, Giuseppe Murante

TL;DR
This study compares galaxy cluster simulations across ten different codes with radiative physics, revealing how radiative processes influence cluster properties and code consistency, especially regarding entropy profiles and stellar content.
Contribution
First comprehensive comparison of galaxy cluster simulations with radiative physics across multiple codes, highlighting the impact of radiative processes and AGN feedback on cluster properties.
Findings
Dark matter is more centrally concentrated with radiative physics.
Radiative physics reduces code-based differences in entropy profiles.
AGN feedback influences stellar distribution and overcooling.
Abstract
We have simulated the formation of a massive galaxy cluster (M = 1.110) in a CDM universe using 10 different codes (RAMSES, 2 incarnations of AREPO and 7 of GADGET), modeling hydrodynamics with full radiative subgrid physics. These codes include Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH), spanning traditional and advanced SPH schemes, adaptive mesh and moving mesh codes. Our goal is to study the consistency between simulated clusters modeled with different radiative physical implementations - such as cooling, star formation and AGN feedback. We compare images of the cluster at , global properties such as mass, and radial profiles of various dynamical and thermodynamical quantities. We find that, with respect to non-radiative simulations, dark matter is more centrally concentrated, the extent not simply depending on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
