Swift Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Pulse Shapes: GRB Pulse Spectral Evolution Clarified
Jon Hakkila, Amy Lien, Takanori Sakamoto, David Morris, James E. Neff,, and Timothy W. Giblin

TL;DR
This paper analyzes Swift gamma-ray burst pulses, revealing their three-peaked structure and spectral evolution, and shows that energy injection occurs three times during a pulse, challenging previous classifications.
Contribution
It provides a detailed spectral and temporal analysis of isolated GRB pulses, highlighting their triple-peaked shape and complex spectral evolution, which were not fully understood before.
Findings
GRB pulses have a three-peaked structure with distinct spectral features.
Hard-to-soft evolution dominates, especially in asymmetric pulses.
Energy injection occurs at three separate times during a pulse.
Abstract
Isolated Swift gamma-ray burst (GRB) pulses, like their higher-energy BATSE counterparts, emit the bulk of their pulsed emission as a hard-to-soft component that can be fitted by the Norris et al. (2005) empirical pulse model. This signal is overlaid by a fainter, three-peaked signal that can be modeled by an empirical wave-like function (Hakkila and Preece, 2014): the two fits combine to reproduce GRB pulses with distinctive three-peaked shapes. The precursor peak appears on or before the pulse rise and is often the hardest component, the central peak is the brightest, and the decay peak converts exponentially decaying emission into a long, soft, power-law tail. Accounting for systematic instrumental differences, the general characteristics of the fitted pulses are remarkably similar. Isolated GRB pulses are dominated by hard-to-soft evolution; this is more pronounced for asymmetric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
