Analytical development of the lunisolar disturbing function and the critical inclination secular resonance
Alessandra Celletti, C\u{a}t\u{a}lin Gale\c{s}, Giuseppe Pucacco,, Aaron J. Rosengren

TL;DR
This paper provides a corrected and detailed analytical expansion of the lunisolar disturbing function, addressing previous inaccuracies, and applies it to analyze the long-term dynamics of highly elliptical, critically inclined orbits.
Contribution
It offers a self-consistent, corrected derivation of the lunisolar disturbing function expansion, clarifying previous errors and enhancing the accuracy of long-term orbital dynamics analysis.
Findings
Corrected the derivation of the lunisolar disturbing function.
Compared different expansions and identified errors in literature.
Applied the expansion to analyze Molniya orbit dynamics.
Abstract
We provide a detailed derivation of the analytical expansion of the lunar and solar disturbing functions. Although there exist several papers on this topic, many derivations contain mistakes in the final expansion or rather (just) in the proof, thereby necessitating a recasting and correction of the original derivation. In this work, we provide a self-consistent and definite form of the lunisolar expansion. We start with Kaula's expansion of the disturbing function in terms of the equatorial elements of both the perturbed and perturbing bodies. Then we give a detailed proof of Lane's expansion, in which the elements of the Moon are referred to the ecliptic plane. Using this approach the inclination of the Moon becomes nearly constant, while the argument of perihelion, the longitude of the ascending node, and the mean anomaly vary linearly with time. We make a comparison between the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
