Bayesian model selection for the glacial-interglacial cycle
Jake Carson, Michel Crucifix, Simon Preston, Richard D. Wilkinson

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Bayesian model selection for glacial-interglacial cycles is feasible with current computational methods, enabling discrimination between models using short paleoclimate records and highlighting the importance of joint chronology estimation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel Bayesian approach using SMC^2 and Brownian bridge proposals to accurately estimate Bayes factors for climate models with limited data.
Findings
Bayesian analysis now feasible for complex climate models
Different chronologies can lead to conflicting model conclusions
Joint inference of chronology and model parameters is necessary
Abstract
A prevailing viewpoint in palaeoclimate science is that a single palaeoclimate record contains insufficient information to discriminate between most competing explanatory models. Results we present here suggest the contrary. Using SMC^2 combined with novel Brownian bridge type proposals for the state trajectories, we show that even with relatively short time series it is possible to estimate Bayes factors to sufficient accuracy to be able to select between competing models. The results show that Monte Carlo methodology and computer power have now advanced to the point where a full Bayesian analysis for a wide class of conceptual climate models is now possible. The results also highlight a problem with estimating the chronology of the climate record prior to further statistical analysis, a practice which is common in palaeoclimate science. Using two datasets based on the same record but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
