Crowdsourcing quality control for Dark Energy Survey images
P. Melchior, E. Sheldon, A. Drlica-Wagner, E. S. Rykoff, T. M. C., Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, S. Allam, A. Benoit-Levy, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer,, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, M. Crocce, C. B. D'Andrea,, L. N. da Costa, S. Desai, P. Doel, A. E. Evrard

TL;DR
This paper presents a crowdsourcing web application for image quality control in the Dark Energy Survey, enabling users to identify and report issues in astronomical images, thereby improving data quality efficiently.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel crowdsourcing tool for astronomical image quality control, including user engagement strategies and lessons learned from deployment with over 100 users.
Findings
User reports helped rapidly correct subtle image artifacts
The platform engaged both professional and amateur astronomers
Open-source code and online demo are available for community use
Abstract
We have developed a crowdsourcing web application for image quality control employed by the Dark Energy Survey. Dubbed the "DES exposure checker", it renders science-grade images directly to a web browser and allows users to mark problematic features from a set of predefined classes. Users can also generate custom labels and thus help identify previously unknown problem classes. User reports are fed back to hardware and software experts to help mitigate and eliminate recognized issues. We report on the implementation of the application and our experience with its over 100 users, the majority of which are professional or prospective astronomers but not data management experts. We discuss aspects of user training and engagement, and demonstrate how problem reports have been pivotal to rapidly correct artifacts which would likely have been too subtle or infrequent to be recognized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
