A tight relation between series-parallel graphs and Bipartite Distance Hereditary graphs
Nicola Apollonio, Massimiliano Caramia, Paolo Giulio Franciosa,, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Mascari

TL;DR
This paper reveals a fundamental connection between bipartite distance hereditary graphs and series-parallel graphs, showing they share the same inductive construction when viewed through the lens of graphic matroids, leading to various applications.
Contribution
It establishes that bipartite distance hereditary graphs and series-parallel graphs are structurally equivalent via their inductive constructions, unifying two well-studied graph classes.
Findings
The two graph classes are the same when viewed as fundamental graphs of a graphic matroid.
Re-proves known properties of bipartite distance hereditary and series-parallel graphs.
Provides new polynomially-solvable instances for the maximum multi-commodity flow problem.
Abstract
Bandelt and Mulder's structural characterization of Bipartite Distance Hereditary graphs asserts that such graphs can be built inductively starting from a single vertex and by repeatedly adding either pending vertices or twins (i.e., vertices with the same neighborhood as an existing one). Dirac and Duffin's structural characterization of 2-connected series-parallel graphs asserts that such graphs can be built inductively starting from a single edge by adding either edges in series or in parallel. In this paper we prove that the two constructions are the same construction when bipartite graphs are viewed as the fundamental graphs of a graphic matroid. We then apply the result to re-prove known results concerning bipartite distance hereditary graphs and series-parallel graphs, to characterize self-dual outer-planar graphs and, finally, to provide a new class of polynomially-solvable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
