Satellite Quenching and Galactic Conformity at 0.3 < z < 2.5
Lalitwadee Kawinwanichakij, Ryan F. Quadri, Casey Papovich, Glenn G., Kacprzak, Ivo Labb\'e, Lee R. Spitler, Caroline Straatman, Kim-Vy Tran,, Rebecca Allen, Peter S. Behroozi, Michael Cowley, Avishai Dekel, Karl, Glazebrook, William G. Hartley, Daniel D. Kelson, David C. Koo

TL;DR
This study investigates how satellite galaxy quenching and galactic conformity evolve from redshift 0.3 to 2.5, revealing persistent conformity signals and their dependence on central galaxy properties.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of satellite quenching and conformity across a broad redshift range using deep near-infrared surveys, highlighting the connection to central galaxy star-formation.
Findings
Satellites around quiescent centrals are more likely to be quenched.
Galactic conformity is significant at 0.6<z<1.6, indicating long-standing effects.
Satellite quenching efficiency increases with central stellar mass.
Abstract
We measure the evolution of the quiescent fraction and quenching efficiency of satellites around star-forming and quiescent central galaxies with stellar mass at . We combine imaging from three deep near-infrared-selected surveys (ZFOURGE/CANDELS, UDS, and UltraVISTA), which allows us to select a stellar-mass complete sample of satellites with . Satellites for both star-forming and quiescent central galaxies have higher quiescent fractions compared to field galaxies matched in stellar mass at all redshifts. We also observe "galactic conformity": satellites around quiescent centrals are more likely to be quenched compared to the satellites around star-forming centrals. In our sample, this conformity signal is significant at for , whereas it is only weakly significant at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
