On the construction of fully interpreted formal languages which posses their truth predicates
Seppo Heikkil\"a

TL;DR
This paper presents a recursive construction method for a fully interpreted formal language with its own truth predicate, enabling the language to internally express and interpret its sentences.
Contribution
It introduces a transfinite recursion approach to build a sublanguage with an embedded truth predicate, advancing formal language theory.
Findings
Constructed a sublanguage with a truth predicate
Used transfinite recursion to define truth assignments
Established a fully interpreted language with internal truth
Abstract
We shall construct by ordinary recursion method subsets to the set of G\"odel numbers of the sentences of a language . That language is formed by sentences of a fully interpreted formal language , called an MA language, and sentences containing a monadic predicate letter . From the class of the constructed subsets of we extract one set by transfinite recursion method. Interpret those sentences whose G\"odel numbers are in as true, and their negations as false. These sentences together form an MA language. It is a sublanguage of having as its sublanguage, and is its truth predicate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · semigroups and automata theory · Advanced Algebra and Logic
