Modelling influence and opinion evolution in online collective behaviour
Corentin Vande Kerckhove, Samuel Martin, Pascal Gend, Peter J., Rentfrow, Julien M. Hendrickx, and Vincent D. Blondel

TL;DR
This study introduces a validated consensus model for predicting opinion evolution in online collective behavior, using real-world data and accounting for individual influenceability and unpredictability in judgment revision.
Contribution
It is the first to test a quantitative opinion dynamics model's predictive power against real data without calibration bias, highlighting the role of unpredictability.
Findings
Over two thirds of prediction errors are due to human unpredictability.
Model accuracy improves with prior knowledge of individual behavior.
Prediction is limited by inherent unpredictability in judgment revision.
Abstract
Opinion evolution and judgment revision are mediated through social influence. Based on a large crowdsourced in vitro experiment (n=861), it is shown how a consensus model can be used to predict opinion evolution in online collective behaviour. It is the first time the predictive power of a quantitative model of opinion dynamics is tested against a real dataset. Unlike previous research on the topic, the model was validated on data which did not serve to calibrate it. This avoids to favor more complex models over more simple ones and prevents overfitting. The model is parametrized by the influenceability of each individual, a factor representing to what extent individuals incorporate external judgments. The prediction accuracy depends on prior knowledge on the participants' past behaviour. Several situations reflecting data availability are compared. When the data is scarce, the data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
