Interdicting Structured Combinatorial Optimization Problems with {0,1}-Objectives
Stephen R. Chestnut, Rico Zenklusen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a general method for approximating interdiction problems in combinatorial optimization, providing pseudo-approximations that balance solution quality and interdiction budget overrun, applicable to various problem types.
Contribution
The authors propose a versatile pseudo-approximation framework for interdiction problems, capable of handling submodular costs and improving results with problem-specific structural insights.
Findings
Provides a pseudo-approximation algorithm for interdiction problems.
Handles submodular interdiction costs in maximum weight independent set.
Develops a PTAS for interdiction of b-stable sets in bipartite graphs.
Abstract
Interdiction problems ask about the worst-case impact of a limited change to an underlying optimization problem. They are a natural way to measure the robustness of a system, or to identify its weakest spots. Interdiction problems have been studied for a wide variety of classical combinatorial optimization problems, including maximum - flows, shortest - paths, maximum weight matchings, minimum spanning trees, maximum stable sets, and graph connectivity. Most interdiction problems are NP-hard, and furthermore, even designing efficient approximation algorithms that allow for estimating the order of magnitude of a worst-case impact, has turned out to be very difficult. Not very surprisingly, the few known approximation algorithms are heavily tailored for specific problems. Inspired by an approach of Burch et al. (2003), we suggest a general method to obtain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
