
TL;DR
This paper analyzes hypercharged fields of various spins to understand the LHC diboson excess, identifying viable candidates and constraints within a model-independent effective theory framework.
Contribution
It provides a model-independent analysis of hypercharged fields, identifying which spins can explain the diboson anomaly and deriving bounds on associated new particles.
Findings
Hypercharged scalar and spin 2 cannot explain the anomaly at tree level.
Hypercharged vector can explain the anomaly if a Z' is introduced.
Bounds on Z' mass are consistent with LHC and electroweak data.
Abstract
We conduct a model-independent effective theory analysis of hypercharged fields with various spin structures towards understanding the diboson excess found in LHC run I, as well as possible future anomalies involving and modes. Within the assumption of no additional physics beyond the standard model up to the scale of the possible diboson resonance, we show that a hypercharged scalar and a spin 2 particle do not have tree-level and decay channels up to dimension 5 operators, and cannot therefore account for the anomaly, whereas a hypercharged vector is a viable candidate provided we also introduce a in order to satisfy electroweak precision constraints. We calculate bounds on the mass consistent with the Atlas/CMS diboson signals as well as electroweak precision data, taking into account both LHC run I and II data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
