The inclusion of configuration spaces of surfaces in Cartesian products, its induced homomorphism, and the virtual cohomological dimension of the braid groups of S^2 and RP^2
Daciberg Lima Gon\c{c}alves, John Guaschi (LMNO)

TL;DR
This paper proves a conjecture about the kernel of a homomorphism related to configuration spaces of spheres and projective planes, and determines the virtual cohomological dimension of their braid groups and mapping class groups.
Contribution
It proves Birman's conjecture for S^2 and RP^2, describes the structure of the kernel, and computes the virtual cohomological dimensions of the associated braid and mapping class groups.
Findings
Proved Birman's conjecture for S^2 and RP^2.
Described the kernel of the induced homomorphism as a specific subgroup.
Calculated the virtual cohomological dimension of braid groups and mapping class groups.
Abstract
Let M be a surface, perhaps with boundary, and either compact, or with a finite number of points removed from the interior of the surface. We consider the inclusion i: F\_n(M) --\textgreater{} M^n of the nth configuration space F\_n(M) of M into the n-fold Cartesian product of M, as well as the induced homomorphism i\_\#: P\_n(M) --\textgreater{} (\pi\_1(M))^n, where P\_n(M) is the n-string pure braid group of M. Both i and i\_\# were studied initially by J.Birman who conjectured that Ker(i\_\#) is equal to the normal closure of the Artin pure braid group P\_n in P\_n(M). The conjecture was later proved by C.Goldberg for compact surfaces without boundary different from the 2-sphere S^2 and the projective plane RP^2. In this paper, we prove the conjecture for S^2 and RP^2. In the case of RP^2, we prove that Ker(i\_\#) is equal to the commutator subgroup of P\_n(RP^2), we show that it may…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
