LoCuSS: Testing hydrostatic equilibrium in galaxy clusters
G. P. Smith, P. Mazzotta, N. Okabe, F. Ziparo, S. L. Mulroy, A. Babul,, A. Finoguenov, I. G. McCarthy, M. Lieu, Y. Bahe, H. Bourdin, A. E. Evrard, T., Futamase, C. P. Haines, M. Jauzac, D. P. Marrone, R. Martino, P. E. May, J., E. Taylor, K. Umetsu

TL;DR
This study tests the hydrostatic equilibrium assumption in galaxy clusters using X-ray and weak-lensing data, finding minimal bias that challenges previous cosmological discrepancy explanations.
Contribution
It provides precise weak-lensing mass measurements and compares them with X-ray and Planck estimates, revealing small hydrostatic bias in galaxy clusters.
Findings
Mean X-ray to lensing mass ratio is 0.95±0.05.
Planck mass estimates are consistent with lensing masses at 0.95±0.04.
Hydrostatic bias is too small to resolve Planck cosmology tensions.
Abstract
We test the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium in an X-ray luminosity selected sample of 50 galaxy clusters at from the Local Cluster Substructure Survey (LoCuSS). Our weak-lensing measurements of control systematic biases to sub-4 per cent, and our hydrostatic measurements of the same achieve excellent agreement between XMM-Newton and Chandra. The mean ratio of X-ray to lensing mass for these 50 clusters is , and for the 44 clusters also detected by Planck, the mean ratio of Planck mass estimate to LoCuSS lensing mass is . Based on a careful like-for-like analysis, we find that LoCuSS, the Canadian Cluster Comparison Project (CCCP), and Weighing the Giants (WtG) agree on at . This small level of hydrostatic bias disagrees at with the level required to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
