Ranking scientists

TL;DR

This paper critiques the $h$-index for ranking scientists, highlighting its biases, and proposes a new, simple criterion for more accurate scientist ranking.

Contribution

It introduces a novel, straightforward criterion for ranking scientists that addresses the biases of the $h$-index.

Findings

The $h$-index favors modestly performing researchers.

A new criterion provides a more accurate ranking.

The proposed method improves ranking fairness.

Abstract

Currently the ranking of scientists is based on the $h$-index, which is widely perceived as an imprecise and simplistic though still useful metric. We find that the $h$-index actually favours modestly performing researchers and propose a simple criterion for proper ranking.