Regularization and Bayesian Learning in Dynamical Systems: Past, Present and Future
A. Chiuso

TL;DR
This paper reviews the evolution of regularization and Bayesian methods in system identification, emphasizing historical and foundational issues to clarify their development and connection to past work.
Contribution
It provides a historical perspective on regularization and Bayesian approaches in system identification, highlighting fundamental issues and clarifying links with earlier research.
Findings
Historical evolution of regularization in system identification
Fundamental issues like compound estimation and exchangeability
Clarification of links between recent and past work
Abstract
Regularization and Bayesian methods for system identification have been repopularized in the recent years, and proved to be competitive w.r.t. classical parametric approaches. In this paper we shall make an attempt to illustrate how the use of regularization in system identification has evolved over the years, starting from the early contributions both in the Automatic Control as well as Econometrics and Statistics literature. In particular we shall discuss some fundamental issues such as compound estimation problems and exchangeability which play and important role in regularization and Bayesian approaches, as also illustrated in early publications in Statistics. The historical and foundational issues will be given more emphasis (and space), at the expense of the more recent developments which are only briefly discussed. The main reason for such a choice is that, while the recent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsControl Systems and Identification · Statistical and numerical algorithms · Fault Detection and Control Systems
