Measures of irrationality for hypersurfaces of large degree
Francesco Bastianelli, Pietro De Poi, Lawrence Ein, Robert Lazarsfeld, and Brooke Ullery

TL;DR
This paper investigates measures of irrationality for high-degree hypersurfaces, establishing lower bounds on rational coverings and gonality, and connecting positivity of canonical bundles to these invariants.
Contribution
It provides new lower bounds for rational maps from hypersurfaces of large degree and offers simplified proofs of existing results using positivity properties.
Findings
Dominant rational maps from hypersurfaces have degree at least d-1.
Positivity of canonical bundles yields lower bounds on irrationality measures.
New proofs of results by Ran and Beheshti-Eisenbud are presented.
Abstract
We study various measures of irrationality for hypersurfaces of large degree in projective space and other varieties. These include the least degree of a rational covering of projective space, and the minimal gonality of a covering family of curves. The theme is that positivity properties of canonical bundles lead to lower bounds on these invariants. In particular, we prove that if X is a very general smooth hypersurface of dimension n and degree d \ge 2n+1, then any dominant rational mapping from X to projective n-space must have degree at least d-1. We also propose a number of open problems, and we show how our methods lead to simple new proofs of results of Ran and Beheshti-Eisenbud.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
