Searches for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles in IceCube
IceCube Collaboration: M. G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J., Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, T. Anderson, I., Ansseau, M. Archinger, C. Arguelles, T. C. Arlen, J. Auffenberg, X. Bai, S., W. Barwick, V. Baum, R. Bay, J. J. Beatty, J. Becker Tjus

TL;DR
This paper reports on searches for relativistic magnetic monopoles in IceCube, setting new upper limits on their flux and improving previous constraints by nearly two orders of magnitude.
Contribution
First search for relativistic magnetic monopoles in IceCube data, establishing the most stringent flux limits to date for monopoles traveling faster than 0.51c.
Findings
No monopole candidates detected.
Flux limits constrained to 1.55x10^-18 cm^-2 s^-1 sr^-1 for velocities above 0.51c.
Significant improvement over previous experimental limits.
Abstract
Various extensions of the Standard Model motivate the existence of stable magnetic monopoles that could have been created during an early high-energy epoch of the Universe. These primordial magnetic monopoles would be gradually accelerated by cosmic magnetic fields and could reach high velocities that make them visible in Cherenkov detectors such as IceCube. Equivalently to electrically charged particles, magnetic monopoles produce direct and indirect Cherenkov light while traversing through matter at relativistic velocities. This paper describes searches for relativistic (v>0.76c) and mildly relativistic (v>0.51c) monopoles, each using one year of data taken in 2008/09 and 2011/12 respectively. No monopole candidate was detected. For a velocity above 0.51c the monopole flux is constrained down to a level of 1.55x10^-18 cm-2 s-1 sr-1. This is an improvement of almost two orders of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
