Spectroscopic aperture biases in inside-out evolving early-type galaxies from CALIFA
J. M. Gomes, P. Papaderos, J. M. V\'ilchez, C. Kehrig, J., Iglesias-P\'aramo, I. Breda, M. D. Lehnert, S. F. S\'anchez, B. Ziegler, S., N. dos Reis, J. Bland-Hawthorn, L. Galbany, D. J. Bomans, F. F., Rosales-Ortega, C. J. Walcher, R. Garc\'ia-Benito, I. M\'arquez, A. del Olmo,

TL;DR
This study reveals that aperture biases in spectroscopic surveys cause misclassification of inside-out evolving early-type galaxies, underestimating their star formation activity at low redshift due to limited spatial coverage.
Contribution
It demonstrates empirically and theoretically how aperture effects bias the classification of inside-out growing early-type galaxies in spectroscopic surveys.
Findings
Aperture bias causes misclassification of star-forming regions in early-type galaxies.
SDSS spectroscopy at low z often misses outer star-forming zones, leading to incorrect galaxy classification.
A simple model reproduces the radial EW distribution and predicts increasing bias at lower redshifts.
Abstract
Integral field spectroscopy studies based on CALIFA data have recently revealed the presence of ongoing low-level star formation (SF) in the periphery of ~10% of local early-type galaxies (ETGs), witnessing a still ongoing inside-out galaxy growth process. A distinctive property of the nebular component in these ETGs, classified i+, is a two-radial-zone structure, with the inner zone displaying LINER emission with a H\alpha equivalent width EW~1{\AA}, and the outer one (3{\AA}<EW<~20{\AA}) showing HII-region characteristics. Using CALIFA IFS data, we empirically demonstrate that the confinement of nebular emission to the galaxy periphery leads to a strong aperture (or, redshift) bias in spectroscopic single-fiber studies of type i+ ETGs: At low redshift (<~0.45), SDSS spectroscopy is restricted to the inner (SF-devoid LINER) zone, thereby leading to their erroneous classification as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
