The no-spin zone: rotation vs dispersion support in observed and simulated dwarf galaxies
Coral Wheeler (1), Andrew B. Pace (1)(2), James S. Bullock (1),, Michael Boylan-Kolchin (3), Jose Onorbe (4), Oliver D. Elbert (1), Alex Fitts, (3), Philip F. Hopkins (5), Dusan Keres (6) ((1) UC Irvine, (2) Texas A&M, University, (3) University of Texas at Austin, (4) MPIA

TL;DR
This study uses Bayesian analysis to show that most dwarf galaxies are dispersion-supported rather than rotation-supported, challenging traditional classifications and suggesting a common formation mechanism.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic Bayesian comparison of rotation versus dispersion support in observed and simulated dwarf galaxies across a wide mass range.
Findings
80% of observed dwarf galaxies are dispersion-supported.
Simulated isolated dwarf galaxies match observed kinematic properties.
Transforming a dIrr into a dSph may be as simple as removing gas.
Abstract
We perform a systematic Bayesian analysis of rotation vs. dispersion support () in dwarf galaxies throughout the Local Volume (LV) over a stellar mass range . We find that the stars in of the LV dwarf galaxies studied -- both satellites and isolated systems -- are dispersion-supported. In particular, we show that *isolated* dwarfs in our sample have . All have . These results challenge the traditional view that the stars in gas-rich dwarf irregulars (dIrrs) are distributed in cold, rotationally-supported stellar disks, while gas-poor dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) are kinematically distinct in having dispersion-supported stars. We see no clear trend between and distance to the closest …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
