Cosmological limits on neutrino unknowns versus low redshift priors
Eleonora Di Valentino, Elena Giusarma, Olga Mena, Alessandro, Melchiorri, Joseph Silk

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different low redshift priors influence cosmological constraints on neutrino masses and sterile neutrino models, highlighting the importance of priors in interpreting CMB data.
Contribution
It analyzes the impact of various low redshift priors on neutrino mass bounds from Planck CMB data, emphasizing the potential to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy.
Findings
Neutrino mass bounds vary significantly with different priors on Hubble constant and cluster mass bias.
A reionization optical depth of τ=0.05±0.01 could constrain the sum of neutrino masses to below 0.0926 eV.
Future priors on reionization could enable cosmological determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy.
Abstract
Recent Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) temperature and polarization anisotropy measurements from the Planck mission have significantly improved previous constraints on the neutrino masses as well as the bounds on extended models with massless or massive sterile neutrino states. However, due to parameter degeneracies, additional low redshift priors are mandatory in order to sharpen the CMB neutrino bounds. We explore here the role of different priors on low redshift quantities, such as the Hubble constant, the cluster mass bias, and the reionization optical depth . Concerning current priors on the Hubble constant and the cluster mass bias, the bounds on the neutrino parameters may differ appreciably depending on the choices adopted in the analyses. With regard to future improvements in the priors on the reionization optical depth, a value of , motivated by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
