Comment on 'A new nanoscale metastable iron phase in carbon steels'
Cyril Cayron

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent claim of a new iron phase in steels, demonstrating that the diffraction patterns used as evidence can be explained by twin effects, not a new phase.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing that previously claimed evidence for a new phase is actually due to twin effects, challenging the original interpretation.
Findings
Selected area diffraction patterns can be simulated by twin effects
The evidence does not support the existence of a new hexagonal phase
The original diffraction patterns do not prove a new phase
Abstract
We show that the selected area diffraction patterns presented in a recent paper (T. Liu et al. Sci. Rep. 2015 5, 15331) do not prove the existence of a new hexagonal phase in martensitic steels. They can be actually simulated by twin effects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties
