Incentive Stackelberg Mean-payoff Games
Anshul Gupta, M. S. Krishna Deepak, Bharath Kumar Padarthi, Sven, Schewe, and Ashutosh Trivedi

TL;DR
This paper introduces incentive equilibria in multi-player mean-payoff games, allowing a leader to influence followers through payoffs, which can improve the leader's payoff and has implications for game analysis complexity.
Contribution
It defines incentive equilibria, proves their existence, analyzes their computational complexity, and provides algorithms with experimental validation.
Findings
Incentive equilibria always exist in mean-payoff games.
Constructing incentive equilibria is NP-complete.
When players are fixed, complexity matches two-player mean-payoff games.
Abstract
We introduce and study incentive equilibria for multi-player meanpayoff games. Incentive equilibria generalise well-studied solution concepts such as Nash equilibria and leader equilibria (also known as Stackelberg equilibria). Recall that a strategy profile is a Nash equilibrium if no player can improve his payoff by changing his strategy unilaterally. In the setting of incentive and leader equilibria, there is a distinguished player called the leader who can assign strategies to all other players, referred to as her followers. A strategy profile is a leader strategy profile if no player, except for the leader, can improve his payoff by changing his strategy unilaterally, and a leader equilibrium is a leader strategy profile with a maximal return for the leader. In the proposed case of incentive equilibria, the leader can additionally influence the behaviour of her followers by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Economic theories and models · Auction Theory and Applications
