A Bound Violation on the Galaxy Group Scale: The Turn-Around Radius of NGC 5353/4
Jounghun Lee (1), Suk Kim (2), Soo-Chang Rey (2) ((1) Seoul National, University, (2) Chungnam National University)

TL;DR
This paper presents the first observational evidence of a galaxy group, NGC 5353/4, exceeding the predicted maximum turn-around radius by the LambdaCDM cosmological model, challenging current theoretical expectations.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence of a bound-violation on the galaxy group scale, using velocity profiles and empirical models to compare with LambdaCDM predictions.
Findings
NGC 5353/4's turn-around radius exceeds LambdaCDM predictions.
The observed radius is only marginally consistent with LambdaCDM even without spherical symmetry.
The study introduces a method to estimate turn-around radius from observational data.
Abstract
The first observational evidence for the violation of the maximum turn-around radius on the galaxy group scale is presented. The NGC 5353/4 group is chosen as an ideal target for our investigation of the bound-violation because of its proximity, low-density environment, optimal mass scale, and existence of a nearby thin straight filament. Using the observational data on the line-of-sight velocities and three-dimensional distances of the filament galaxies located in the bound zone of the NGC 5353/4 group, we construct their radial velocity profile as a function of separation distance from the group center and then compare it to the analytic formula obtained empirically by Falco et al. (2014) to find the best-fit value of an adjustable parameter with the help of the maximum likelihood method. The turn-around radius of NGC 5353/4 is determined to be the separation distance where the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
