On the LSP3 estimates of surface gravity for LAMOST-Kepler stars with asteroseismic measurements
Juan-Juan Ren, Xiao-Wei Liu, Mao-Sheng Xiang, Yang Huang, Saskia, Hekker, Chun Wang, Hai-Bo Yuan, Alberto Rebassa-Mansergas, Bing-Qiu Chen,, Ning-Chen Sun, Hua-Wei Zhang, Zhi-Ying Huo, Wei Zhang, Yong Zhang, Yong-Hui, Hou, Yue-Fei Wang

TL;DR
This study compares LSP3 spectroscopic surface gravity estimates for Kepler stars with precise asteroseismic measurements, finding good overall agreement and discussing potential improvements for spectroscopic methods.
Contribution
It provides a calibration and validation of LSP3 surface gravity estimates against asteroseismic data, highlighting areas for refinement.
Findings
LSP3 surface gravities agree with Hekker et al. (2012, 2013) within 0.2 dex
Good agreement between LSP3 and Huber et al. (2014) for most stars
Discussions on temperature and metallicity effects on gravity estimates
Abstract
Asteroseismology allows for deriving precise values of surface gravity of stars. The accurate asteroseismic determinations now available for large number of stars in the Kepler fields can be used to check and calibrate surface gravities that are currently being obtained spectroscopically for a huge numbers of stars targeted by large-scale spectroscopic surveys, such as the on-going Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) Galactic survey. The LAMOST spectral surveys have obtained a large number of stellar spectra in the Kepler fields. Stellar atmospheric parameters of those stars have been determined with the LAMOST Stellar Parameter Pipeline at Peking University (LSP3), by template matching with the MILES empirical spectral library. In the current work, we compare surface gravities yielded by LSP3 with those of two asteroseismic samples - the largest sample…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
