No Evidence for Classical Cepheids and a New Dwarf Galaxy Behind the Galactic Disk
P. Pietrukowicz, A. Udalski, M.K. Szymanski, I. Soszynski, G., Pietrzynski, L. Wyrzykowski, R. Poleski, K. Ulaczyk, J. Skowron, P. Mroz, M., Pawlak, S. Kozlowski (Warsaw Univ. Observatory)

TL;DR
This study challenges previous claims of a dwarf galaxy behind the Galactic disk by showing that the candidate stars are not classical Cepheids but likely spotted stars, emphasizing caution in classifying variable stars based on limited near-infrared data.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that candidate Cepheids in a suspected dwarf galaxy are misclassified, providing a revised analysis that questions the galaxy's existence and highlighting classification challenges.
Findings
None of the four candidate stars are classical Cepheids.
Two stars are non-variable, one is a spotted object, and the fourth's light curve is inconsistent with Cepheids.
The study warns about misclassification risks with limited near-infrared data.
Abstract
Based on data from the ongoing OGLE Galaxy Variability Survey (OGLE GVS) we have verified observed properties of stars detected by the near-infrared VVV survey in a direction near the Galactic plane at longitude l~-27 deg and recently tentatively classified as classical Cepheids belonging to a, hence claimed, dwarf galaxy at a distance of about 90 kpc from the Galactic Center. Three of four stars are detected in the OGLE GVS I-band images. We show that two of the objects are not variable at all and the third one with a period of 5.695 d and a nearly sinusoidal light curve of an amplitude of 0.5 mag cannot be a classical Cepheid and is very likely a spotted object. These results together with a very unusual shape of the Ks-band light curve of the fourth star indicate that very likely none of them is a Cepheid and, thus, there is no evidence for a background dwarf galaxy. Our observations…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
