The extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS): a cosmological forecast
Gong-Bo Zhao, Yuting Wang, Ashley J. Ross, Sarah Shandera, Will J., Percival, Kyle S. Dawson, Jean-Paul Kneib, Adam D. Myers, Joel R. Brownstein,, Johan Comparat, Timoth\'ee Delubac, Pengyuan Gao, Alireza Hojjati, Kazuya, Koyama, Cameron K. McBride, Andr\'es Meza

TL;DR
This paper forecasts the scientific capabilities of the eBOSS survey in measuring cosmological parameters like BAO, RSD, non-Gaussianity, and neutrino mass, highlighting its potential precision and improvements over previous surveys.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed forecast of eBOSS's expected accuracy in key cosmological measurements using multiple tracers and Ly-$a$ forest data.
Findings
eBOSS can achieve 1-2.2% precision in BAO distance measurements.
The survey can constrain $f\sigma_8$ to within 2.5-3.3%.
eBOSS alone can measure primordial non-Gaussianity with $\sigma(f_{NL})\sim10-15$.
Abstract
We present a science forecast for the eBOSS survey, part of the SDSS-IV project, which is a spectroscopic survey using multiple tracers of large-scale structure, including luminous red galaxies (LRGs), emission line galaxies (ELGs) and quasars (both as a direct probe of structure and through the Ly- forest). Focusing on discrete tracers, we forecast the expected accuracy of the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO), the redshift-space distortion (RSD) measurements, the parameter quantifying the primordial non-Gaussianity, the dark energy and modified gravity parameters. We also use the line-of-sight clustering in the Ly- forest to constrain the total neutrino mass. We find that eBOSS LRGs () (combined with the BOSS LRGs at ), ELGs () and Clustering Quasars (CQs) () can achieve a precision of 1%, 2.2% and 1.6% precisions,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
