Isobaric yield ratio difference between the 140 $A$ MeV $^{58, 64}$Ni + $^{9}$Be reactions studied by antisymmetric molecular dynamics model
C. Y. Qiao, H. L. Wei, C. W. Ma, Y. L. Zhang, S. S. Wang

TL;DR
This study uses antisymmetric molecular dynamics and decay models to analyze isobaric yield ratio differences in Ni + Be reactions, revealing sensitivity to nuclear density and collision centrality effects.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the AMD + GEMINI model effectively reproduces experimental IBD results and highlights the influence of collision centrality and decay processes on IBD.
Findings
IBD is sensitive to nuclear density differences.
Central collisions mainly determine IBD for certain isotopes.
Sequential decay impacts IBD results.
Abstract
\item[Background] The isobaric yield ratio difference (IBD) method is found to be sensitive to the density difference of neutron-rich nucleus induced reaction around the Fermi energy. \item[Purpose] An investigation is performed to study the IBD results in the transport model. \item[Methods] The antisymmetric molecular dynamics (AMD) model plus the sequential decay model GEMINI are adopted to simulate the 140 MeV Ni + Be reactions. A relative small coalescence radius R 2.5 fm is used for the phase space at 500 fm/c to form the hot fragment. Two limitations on the impact parameter ( fm and fm) are used to study the effect of central collisions in IBD. \item[Results] The isobaric yield ratios (IYRs) for the large-- fragments are found to be suppressed in the symmetric reaction. The IBD results for fragments with neutron-excess $I…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
