The oxygen abundance gradient in M81 and the robustness of abundance determinations in H II regions

TL;DR

This study evaluates various methods for determining oxygen and nitrogen abundances in H II regions of galaxy M81, highlighting their robustness, limitations, and the impact of observational uncertainties on abundance gradient measurements.

Contribution

It compares the sensitivity and robustness of different abundance determination methods in H II regions, emphasizing the reliability of strong-line methods like C, ONS, and N2 under observational challenges.

Findings

Strong-line methods C, ONS, and N2 are highly robust with low dispersion.

The direct method yields the shallowest abundance gradient but with higher uncertainty.

Different methods produce varying abundance gradients, influenced by observational and physical factors.

Abstract

We study the sensitivity of the methods available for abundance determinations in H II regions to potential observational problems. We compare the dispersions they introduce around the oxygen and nitrogen abundance gradients when applied to five different sets of spectra of H II regions in the galaxy M81. Our sample contains 116 H II regions with galactocentric distances of 3 to 33 kpc, including 48 regions observed by us with the OSIRIS long-slit spectrograph at the 10.4-m Gran Telescopio Canarias telescope. The direct method can be applied to 31 regions, where we can get estimates of the electron temperature. The different methods imply oxygen abundance gradients with slopes of -0.010 to -0.002 dex kpc-1, and dispersions in the range 0.06-0.25 dex. The direct method produces the shallowest slope and the largest dispersion, illustrating the difficulty of obtaining good estimates of the electron temperature. Three of the strong-line methods, C, ONS, and N2, are remarkably robust, with dispersions of ~ 0.06 dex, and slopes in the range -0.008 to -0.006 dex kpc-1. The robustness of each method can be directly related to its sensitivity to the line intensity ratios that are more difficult to measure properly. Since the results of the N2 method depend strongly on the N/O abundance ratio and on the ionization parameter, we recommend the use of the C and ONS methods when no temperature estimates are available or when they have poor quality, although the behaviour of these methods when confronted with regions that have different properties and different values of N/O should be explored.