Relieving tensions related to the lensing of CMB temperature power spectra
F. Couchot, S. Henrot-Versill\'e, O. Perdereau, S. Plaszczynski, B., Rouill\'e d'Orfeuil, M. Spinelli, M. Tristram

TL;DR
This paper investigates the apparent excess gravitational lensing in Planck CMB temperature spectra, identifies correlations with other parameters causing tensions, and demonstrates how combining additional high-$oldsymbol{ extit{ extit{ ext{ell}}}}$ data reduces these tensions and refines parameter estimates.
Contribution
The study shows that including ACT and SPT high-$ extit{ ext{ell}}$ data alleviates tensions in lensing amplitude and improves constraints on nuisance parameters and cosmological parameters.
Findings
$A_L$ measured at 2.6$oldsymbol{ ext{ extsigma}}$ deviation from unity with Planck data.
Tension on reionization optical depth $ au$ reduced from 2$oldsymbol{ ext{ extsigma}}$ to 1.3$oldsymbol{ ext{ extsigma}}$ with Hillipop.
Combined data yields $A_L=1.03oldsymbol{ extpm}0.08$ and $ au=0.052oldsymbol{ extpm}0.035$, consistent with standard cosmology.
Abstract
The angular power spectra of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies reconstructed from Planck data seem to present too much gravitational lensing distortion. This is quantified by the control parameter that should be compatible with unity for a standard cosmology. With the Class Boltzmann solver and the profile-likelihood method, for this parameter we measure a 2.6 shift from 1 using the Planck public likelihoods. We show that, owing to strong correlations with the reionization optical depth and the primordial perturbation amplitude , a tension on also appears between the results obtained with the low () and high () multipoles likelihoods. With Hillipop, another high- likelihood built from Planck data, this difference is lowered to . In this case, the value is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
