Matrix model approximations of fuzzy scalar field theories and their phase diagrams
Juraj Tekel

TL;DR
This paper compares two matrix model approximations of fuzzy scalar field theories, showing that the nonperturbative approach qualitatively matches known phase diagrams, while the perturbative one does not.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes two multitrace matrix model approximations for fuzzy scalar field theories, highlighting their differing abilities to replicate expected phase diagram features.
Findings
Nonperturbative approximation reproduces correct phase diagram features.
Perturbative approximation shows unexpected phase diagram features.
Qualitative agreement with previous numerical studies for the nonperturbative model.
Abstract
We present an analysis of two different approximations to the scalar field theory on the fuzzy sphere, a nonperturbative and a perturbative one, which are both multitrace matrix models. We show that the former reproduces a phase diagram with correct features in a qualitative agreement with the previous numerical studies and that the latter gives a phase diagram with features not expected in the phase diagram of the field theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
