A geometric Achlioptas process
Tobias M\"uller, Reto Sp\"ohel

TL;DR
This paper investigates a two-choice process in random geometric graphs, demonstrating a phase transition in the ability to prevent giant components based on the connection radius, with implications for understanding the power of choices in spatial networks.
Contribution
It introduces a new two-choice process in geometric graphs and establishes a sharp threshold for the emergence of giant components, highlighting the significant impact of choices in spatial network formation.
Findings
Successful avoidance of giant components for r << (n log log n)^{-1/3}
Inevitable giant component formation for r >> (n log log n)^{-1/3}
Offline problem exhibits similar threshold behavior at r(n)=Θ(n^{-1/3})
Abstract
The random geometric graph is obtained by sampling points from the unit square (uniformly at random and independently), and connecting two points whenever their distance is at most , for some given . We consider the following variation on the random geometric graph: in each of rounds in total, a player is offered two random points from the unit square, and has to select exactly one of these two points for inclusion in the evolving geometric graph. We study the problem of avoiding a linear-sized (or "giant") component in this setting. Specifically, we show that for any there is a strategy that succeeds in keeping all component sizes sublinear, with probability tending to one as . We also show that this is tight in the following sense: for any , the player will be forced to create a component of size…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
