The Necessity of Quantizing Gravity
Jeremy Adelman

TL;DR
This paper revisits the Eppley-Hannah thought experiment to argue for the necessity of quantizing gravity, aiming to address previous criticisms and strengthen the case for quantum gravity.
Contribution
It proposes modifications to the original Eppley-Hannah experiment to make it resistant to critiques, reinforcing the argument for quantum gravity.
Findings
Modified thought experiment aims to resolve prior criticisms.
Supports the necessity of quantizing gravity.
Strengthens theoretical foundations for quantum gravity.
Abstract
The Eppley Hannah thought experiment is often cited as justification for attempts by theorists to develop a complete, consistent theory of quantum gravity. A modification of the earlier "Heisenberg microscope" argument for the necessity of quantized light, the Eppley-Hannah thought experiment purports to show that purely classical gravitational waves would either not conserve energy or else allow for violations of the uncertainty principle. However, several subsequent papers have cast doubt as to the validity of the Eppley-Hannah argument. In this paper, we attempt to resurrect the Eppley-Hannah thought experiment by modifying the original argument in such a manner as to render it immune to the present criticisms levied against it.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
