Non-local rheology in dense granular flows -- Revisiting the concept of fluidity

TL;DR

This paper reviews and compares different non-local rheology models for dense granular flows, emphasizing the importance of the fluidity parameter and boundary conditions in distinguishing these approaches.

Contribution

It provides a comparative analysis of various non-local rheology models, highlighting key differences and suggesting future experimental tests to discriminate between them.

Findings

Different models rely on distinct fluidity parameters.

Linearized predictions are insufficient to distinguish models.

Future tests should focus on boundary conditions and dynamical mechanisms.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to discuss the concepts of non-local rheology and fluidity, recently introduced to describe dense granular flows. We review and compare various approaches based on different constitutive relations and choices for the fluidity parameter, focusing on the kinetic elasto-plastic model introduced by Bocquet et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett 103, 036001 (2009)] for soft matter, and adapted for granular matter by Kamrin et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 178301 (2012)], and the gradient expansion of the local rheology $\mu(I)$ that we have proposed [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 238301 (2013)]. We emphasise that, to discriminate between these approaches, one has to go beyond the predictions derived from linearisation around a uniform stress profile, such as that obtained in a simple shear cell. We argue that future tests can be based on the nature of the chosen fluidity parameter, and the related boundary conditions, as well as the hypothesis made to derive the models and the dynamical mechanisms underlying their dynamics.