Prominent but Less Productive: The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists' Research
Erin Leahey, Christine Beckman, and Taryn Stanko

TL;DR
This paper empirically examines whether interdisciplinary research (IDR) leads to more impactful scientific outcomes and explores the potential costs associated with pursuing IDR.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the benefits and costs of IDR, addressing a gap in understanding its actual impact on scientific productivity and innovation.
Findings
IDR is associated with higher scientific impact but lower productivity.
Researchers engaging in IDR face higher costs and challenges.
IDR's benefits vary across disciplines and research contexts.
Abstract
Inter-disciplinary research (IDR) is being promoted by federal agencies and universities nationwide because it presumably spurs transformative, innovative science. In this paper we bring empirical data to assess whether IDR is indeed beneficial, and whether costs accompany potential benefits.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Conferences and Exhibitions Management
