Quantum vs Classical Proofs and Subset Verification
Bill Fefferman, Shelby Kimmel

TL;DR
This paper investigates the power of quantum verifiers in subset verification, establishing new oracle separations between QCMA, QMA, and AM, and introducing a general framework for such proofs.
Contribution
It develops a framework to prove limitations of QCMA verifiers and demonstrates new oracle separations between quantum complexity classes.
Findings
Proves an oracle separation between QCMA and QMA using an in-place permutation oracle.
Establishes a standard oracle separation between QCMA and AM.
Introduces a general framework for analyzing quantum verifier capabilities.
Abstract
We study the ability of efficient quantum verifiers to decide properties of exponentially large subsets given either a classical or quantum witness. We develop a general framework that can be used to prove that QCMA machines, with only classical witnesses, cannot verify certain properties of subsets given implicitly via an oracle. We use this framework to prove an oracle separation between QCMA and QMA using an "in-place" permutation oracle, making the first progress on this question since Aaronson and Kuperberg in 2007. We also use the framework to prove a particularly simple standard oracle separation between QCMA and AM.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
