On the origin of two unidentified radio/X-ray sources discovered with XMM-Newton
Federico Garc\'ia (1,2), Jorge A. Combi (1,2), Mar\'ia C. Medina (1), and Gustavo E. Romero (1,2) ((1) IAR-CONICET, (2) FCAGLP, Argentina)

TL;DR
This study investigates two unidentified X-ray sources with radio counterparts, exploring whether they are Galactic or extragalactic, and suggests they are likely a radio galaxy with an active nucleus and lobes based on multiwavelength data.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the nature of two unidentified X-ray sources, proposing a plausible extragalactic radio galaxy scenario supported by spectral and spatial data.
Findings
Sources are best fitted by absorbed power-law spectra.
The most likely scenario is a radio galaxy with an active nucleus and lobes.
Galactic origin is constrained to within 2 kpc, with specific size and luminosity estimates.
Abstract
We aim at clarifying the nature of the emission of two spatially related unidentified X-ray sources detected with XMM-Newton telescope at intermediate-low Galactic latitude. Observations reveal a point-like source aligned with elongated diffuse emission. The X-ray spectra are best-fitted by absorbed power laws with photon indices ~1.7 for the point-like and ~2.0 for the extended one. Both sources show nonthermal radio-continuum counterparts that might indicate a physical association. From the available data, we did not detect variability on the point-like source in several timescales. Two possible scenarios are analyzed: first, based on HI line absorption, assuming a Galactic origin, we infer a distance upper bound of <2 kpc, which poses a constraint on the height over the Galactic plane of <200 pc and on the linear size of the system of <2.3 pc. In this case, the X-ray luminosities are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
