Where are all of the nebulae ionized by supersoft X-ray sources?
T. E. Woods, M. Gilfanov

TL;DR
This paper argues that most supersoft X-ray sources (SSSs) are embedded in low-density environments, explaining the scarcity of observed nebulae and suggesting a need to revise models and survey strategies for detecting these ionized regions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that SSSs typically reside in lower density media than previously assumed, revises the model of their nebulae, and proposes survey strategies to detect more of these ionized regions.
Findings
Most SSSs are in low-density ISM environments.
CAL 83 is in an unusually dense ISM region.
Probability of such dense environment is about 18%.
Abstract
Accreting, steadily nuclear-burning white dwarfs are associated with so-called close-binary supersoft X-ray sources (SSSs), observed to have temperatures of a fewK and luminosities on the order of erg/s. These and other types of SSSs are expected to be capable of ionizing their surrounding circumstellar medium, however, to date only one such nebula was detected in the Large Magellanic Cloud (of its 6 known close-binary SSSs), surrounding the accreting, nuclear-burning WD CAL 83. This has led to the conclusion that most SSSs cannot have been both luminous (erg/s) and hot ( few K) for the majority of their past accretion history, unless the density of the ISM surrounding most sources is much less than that inferred for the CAL 83 nebula (4--10). Here we demonstrate that most SSSs must lie in much lower density…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
