"Refsdal" meets Popper: comparing predictions of the re-appearance of the multiply imaged supernova behind MACSJ1149.5+2223
T. Treu, G. Brammer, J. M. Diego, C. Grillo, P. L. Kelly, M. Oguri, S., A. Rodney, P. Rosati, K. Sharon, A. Zitrin, I. Balestra, M. Bradac, T., Broadhurst, G. B. Caminha, A. Halkola, A. Hoag, M. Ishigaki, T. L. Johnson,, W. Karman, R. Kawamata, A. Mercurio, K. B. Schmidt

TL;DR
This study compares seven gravitational lens models predicting the re-appearance of supernova Refsdal behind galaxy cluster MACSJ1149.5+2223, testing their accuracy against observations and providing forecasts for future images.
Contribution
It introduces multiple independent lens models based on HST data and compares their predictions with actual supernova re-appearance timings and magnifications.
Findings
Models agree reasonably well with observed delays and magnifications.
Predicted future supernova images will be detectable with HST.
The models' uncertainties exclude line-of-sight structures and cosmological factors.
Abstract
Supernova "Refsdal," multiply imaged by cluster MACSJ1149.5+2223, represents a rare opportunity to make a true blind test of model predictions in extragalactic astronomy, on a time scale that is short compared to a human lifetime. In order to take advantage of this event, we produced seven gravitational lens models with five independent methods, based on Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Hubble Frontier Field images, along with extensive spectroscopic follow-up observations by HST, the Very Large and the Keck Telescopes. We compare the model predictions and show that they agree reasonably well with the measured time delays and magnification ratios between the known images, even though these quantities were not used as input. This agreement is encouraging, considering that the models only provide statistical uncertainties, and do not include additional sources of uncertainties such as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
