Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. III. Optical Continuum Emission and Broad-Band Time Delays in NGC 5548
M. M. Fausnaugh, K. D. Denney, A. J. Barth, M. C. Bentz, M. C., Bottorff, M. T. Carini, K. V. Croxall, G. De Rosa, M. R. Goad, Keith Horne,, M. D. Joner, S. Kaspi, M. Kim, S. A. Klimanov, C. S. Kochanek, D. C. Leonard,, H. Netzer, B. M. Peterson, K. Schnulle, S. G. Sergeev

TL;DR
This study uses multi-wavelength optical and UV monitoring of NGC 5548 to measure continuum time delays, revealing a larger-than-expected accretion disk size and the influence of broad-line region contamination on lag measurements.
Contribution
It provides detailed optical continuum lag measurements across multiple bands, extending wavelength coverage and comparing results with accretion disk models, highlighting discrepancies with standard theory.
Findings
Continuum lags increase with wavelength, consistent with disk reprocessing models.
Disk radius inferred from lags is three times larger than standard thin-disk predictions.
BLR emission contamination significantly biases short-wavelength lag measurements.
Abstract
We present ground-based optical photometric monitoring data for NGC 5548, part of an extended multi-wavelength reverberation mapping campaign. The light curves have nearly daily cadence from 2014 January to July in nine filters (\emph{BVRI} and \emph{ugriz}). Combined with ultraviolet data from the \emph{Hubble Space Telescope} and \emph{Swift}, we confirm significant time delays between the continuum bands as a function of wavelength, extending the wavelength coverage from 1158\,\AA\ to the band (\,\AA). We find that the lags at wavelengths longer than the {\it V} band are equal to or greater than the lags of high-ionization-state emission lines (such as He\,{\sc ii}\, and ), suggesting that the continuum-emitting source is of a physical size comparable to the inner broad-line region (BLR). The trend of lag with wavelength is broadly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
