
TL;DR
This paper explores the relationships between covering matrices, reflection principles, and square principles, demonstrating consistency results and limitations under large cardinal assumptions and stationary reflection hypotheses.
Contribution
It establishes new consistency results linking square principles with covering matrix reflection principles and analyzes the limitations imposed by cardinal arithmetic and reflection hypotheses.
Findings
Consistency of a(, 2) with (, ) for all with ^+ < under large cardinal assumptions.
Construction of - covering matrices that fail certain reflection principles.
Limits on the existence of normal -covering matrices imposed by cardinal arithmetic and stationary reflection.
Abstract
Covering matrices were introduced by Viale in his proof that the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis follows from the Proper Forcing Axiom. In the course of his work and in subsequent work with Sharon, he isolated two reflection principles, and , which may hold of covering matrices. In this paper, we continue previous work of the author investigating connections between failures of and and variations on Jensen's square principle. We prove that, for a regular cardinal , assuming large cardinals, is consistent with for all with . We demonstrate how to force nice -covering matrices for which fail to satisfy and . We investigate normal covering matrices, showing that, for a regular uncountable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
