Linear Context-Free Tree Languages and Inverse Homomorphisms
Johannes Osterholzer, Toni Dietze, Luisa Herrmann

TL;DR
This paper investigates the closure properties of linear context-free tree languages under inverse linear tree homomorphisms, showing non-closure in general but closure for linear monadic cases, with implications for formal language theory.
Contribution
It proves that linear context-free tree languages are not closed under inverse linear tree homomorphisms, but linear monadic variants are closed, clarifying their theoretical boundaries.
Findings
Linear context-free tree languages are not closed under inverse linear tree homomorphisms.
Linear monadic context-free tree languages are closed under inverse linear tree homomorphisms.
The proof involves encoding Dyck words and analyzing preimages under homomorphisms.
Abstract
We prove that the class of linear context-free tree languages is not closed under inverse linear tree homomorphisms. The proof is by contradiction: we encode Dyck words into a context-free tree language and prove that its preimage under a certain linear tree homomorphism cannot be generated by any context-free tree grammar. A positive result can still be obtained: the linear monadic context-free tree languages are closed under inverse linear tree homomorphisms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
