Sensitivity bias in the mass-radius distribution from Transit Timing Variations and Radial Velocity measurements
Jason H. Steffen (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)

TL;DR
This study investigates biases in exoplanet mass-radius measurements from RV and TTV methods, revealing a sensitivity bias that affects the interpretation of planetary compositions and emphasizing the need for combined approaches.
Contribution
It demonstrates that RV and TTV methods have different sensitivity biases, influencing the observed mass-radius distribution and suggesting combined measurements improve understanding of exoplanet properties.
Findings
RV tends to find higher mass planets for a given size
TTV sensitivity is more uniform across different planets
Combined methods can mitigate bias in mass-radius estimates
Abstract
Motivated by recent discussions, both in private and in the literature, we use a Monte Carlo simulation of planetary systems to investigate sources of bias in determining the mass-radius distribution of exoplanets for the two primary techniques used to measure planetary masses---Radial Velocities (RVs) and Transit Timing Variations (TTVs). We assert that mass measurements derived from these two methods are comparably reliable---as the physics underlying their respective signals is well understood. Nevertheless, their sensitivity to planet mass varies with the properties of the planets themselves. We find that for a given planet size, the RV method tends to find planets with higher mass while the sensitivity of TTVs is more uniform. This ``sensitivity bias'' implies that a complete census of TTV systems is likely to yield a more robust estimate of the mass-radius distribution provided…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
