Convex Relaxations of Optimal Power Flow Problems: An Illustrative Example
Daniel K. Molzahn, Ian A. Hiskens

TL;DR
This paper examines the limitations of semidefinite programming relaxations for optimal power flow problems, showing that physical system characteristics alone cannot explain relaxation success or failure, and explores tighter relaxations using polynomial optimization tools.
Contribution
It demonstrates that physical characteristics do not solely determine SDP relaxation success, and introduces advanced polynomial optimization relaxations to improve problem-solving capabilities.
Findings
SDP relaxation fails or succeeds depending on problem formulation, not physical system properties.
Physical characteristics alone cannot universally predict SDP relaxation outcomes.
Tighter relaxations from polynomial optimization hierarchies can address broader classes of OPF problems.
Abstract
Recently, there has been significant interest in convex relaxations of the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. A semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation globally solves many OPF problems. However, there exist practical problems for which the SDP relaxation fails to yield the global solution. Conditions for the success or failure of the SDP relaxation are valuable for determining whether the relaxation is appropriate for a given OPF problem. To move beyond existing conditions, which only apply to a limited class of problems, a typical conjecture is that failure of the SDP relaxation can be related to physical characteristics of the system. By presenting an example OPF problem with two equivalent formulations, this paper demonstrates that physically based conditions cannot universally explain algorithm behavior. The SDP relaxation fails for one formulation but succeeds in finding the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
