The frequency of snowline-region planets from four-years of OGLE-MOA-Wise second-generation microlensing
Y. Shvartzvald, D. Maoz, A. Udalski, T. Sumi, M. Friedmann, S. Kaspi,, R. Poleski, M.K. Szyma\'nski, J. Skowron, S. Koz{\l}owski, {\L}. Wyrzykowski,, P. Mr\'oz, P. Pietrukowicz, G. Pietrzy\'nski, I. Soszy\'nski, K. Ulaczyk, F., Abe, R.K. Barry, D.P. Bennett, A. Bhattacharya

TL;DR
This study analyzes four years of microlensing data from OGLE, MOA, and Wise surveys, revealing that over half of the stars host snowline planets, with Neptunes being significantly more common than Jupiters, and identifying distinct companion populations.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive statistical estimate of snowline planet frequency from a second-generation microlensing survey, highlighting the prevalence of low-mass planets and companion population distinctions.
Findings
Over 55% of microlensed stars host snowline planets.
Neptune-mass planets are about 10 times more common than Jupiter-mass planets.
The companion-to-host mass ratio distribution shows a deficit at q~10^{-2}, indicating two distinct populations.
Abstract
We present a statistical analysis of the first four seasons from a "second-generation" microlensing survey for extrasolar planets, consisting of near-continuous time coverage of 8 deg of the Galactic bulge by the OGLE, MOA, and Wise microlensing surveys. During this period, 224 microlensing events were observed by all three groups. Over 12% of the events showed a deviation from single-lens microlensing, and for 1/3 of those the anomaly is likely caused by a planetary companion. For each of the 224 events we have performed numerical ray-tracing simulations to calculate the detection efficiency of possible companions as a function of companion-to-host mass ratio and separation. Accounting for the detection efficiency, we find that of microlensed stars host a snowline planet. Moreover, we find that Neptunes-mass planets are times more common than…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
